Cetacean Diversity Estimates:
UHEN &
PYENSON

Plain-Language &
Multilingual  Abstracts

Abstract

Introduction

Data Sources and Data Processing

Methods of Analysis and Methods to Assess Potential Biases

Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

References

Appendix

Test

Print article
 

 
 

Diversity estimates, biases, and historiographic effects: resolving cetacean diversity in the Tertiary

ABSTRACT

The number of cetacean genera varied greatly over their evolutionary history. Cetaceans originated in the Eocene and then rapidly diversified, reaching around 30 genera during the Middle Eocene. The number of genera crashed in the late Eocene, with only eight described from the early Oligocene. This time also represents the putative extinction of archaeocetes and the origin of Neoceti, the clade including extant cetaceans. By the late Oligocene, the number of genera recovered and had begun an expansion that peaked in the middle Miocene, at over 75 genera. Since that time, the number of genera has decreased to around 40 genera extant today.

Ideally, generic counts reflect the actual number of genera in the past (generic richness), but our understanding of past diversity is confounded by many factors. Generic counts are potentially too high because of the prevalence of genera based on non-diagnostic material and taxonomic over-splitting. Taxonomic counts can also appear to be too high if the counts are made in time intervals that are excessively long. Conversely, generic counts are potentially too low because of fossil non-preservation; non-deposition, destruction, or obscured fossil-bearing, continental shelf rocks; and lack of collecting or publication effort. We evaluate each of these factors as a cause of bias in cetacean diversity. Individual causes may have significant effects on both true generic richness and the amount of bias. These factors must be addressed in any evaluations of past diversity, especially for clades represented by an abundance of fossils.

Mark D. Uhen. National Museum of Natural History, Department of Paleobiology, Washington D.C., USA.
Nicholas D. Pyenson. Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

KEY WORDS: diversity, generic; bias; collections; Cetacea; Sirenia; Tertiary

PE Article Number: 10.2.11A
Copyright: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology August 2007
Submission: 21 January 2007. Acceptance: 12 July 2007

 

Next Section

Cetacean Diversity Estimates
Plain-Language & Multilingual  Abstracts | Abstract | Introduction | Data Sources and Data Processing
Methods of Analysis and Methods to Assess Potential Biases | Results
Discussion | Acknowledgements | References | Appendix
Print article