SEARCH SEARCH

Article Search

TABLE 1. Fossil sites information, modern ecology, palaeovegetation and selected leaf traits data of the Toupi flora and Shengxian flora.

    Toupi flora Shengxian flora References
Fossil site information Chronostratigraphic late Burdigalian to Langhian Tortonian He and Wang, 2021; Li et al., 2014
Age 17 -14 Ma 10.5 (± 0.5)Ma
Lithostratigraphic unit Toupi Formation Shengxian Formation
Biostatigraphic Spore-pollen; Miocene Plants, spore-pollen; Miocene
Facies type lake lake
Sediments diatomaceous mudstones, shales mudstones and shales
Modern ecology Vegetation type broad-leaved evergreen broad-leaved evergreen Zhang et al., 2007; this Study
Geography Intermaountain Basin Intermaountain Basin
Elevation (m) 170 280
MAT (°C) 18.4 16.5
MAP (mm) 1518.8 1454
longitude and latitude N 26.751, E116.192 N 29.159, E 121.240
IPR
(pollen)
Vegetation type broad-leaved evergreen subhumid sclerophyllous forest Jacques et al. 2011b
IPR
(macro fossil)
Vegetation type broad-leaved evergreen1 broad-leaved evergreen2 He and Wang, 2021
Leaf trait leaf size bigger smaller this study
leaf margin (no teeth %) 75 67.74
LMA 101.51 91.93

Notes: 1, macro fossils together with pollen data (see He and Wang, 2021); 2, the first author made a IPR analysis with macro fossils.

TABLE 2. The Leaf mass per area (LMA) data of the Toupi flora and Shengxian flora.

Toupi flora Shengian flora
Species/Morphtypes LMA (g/m2) LMA average (g/m2) Species/Morphtypes LM (g/m2) LMA average (g/m2)
Alseodaphne sp. 130.96   Cinnamomum cf. Bejolghota 102.04 102.04
  120.86   Machilus tiantaiense 55.66 55.66
  106.22 119.35      
Ilex sp. 118.33   Ilex cf. championii 85.64 85.64
  135.69 127.01 Ilex protocornuta 142.78 142.78
Lithocarpus sp. 79.88   Lithocarpus cf. glaber 74.47 74.47
  120.11        
  94.91 98.30      
Quercus cf. franchetii 66.28 66.28 Quercus cf. franchetii 91.22 91.22
Quercus sp. 115.50 115.5 Quercus cf. chenii 86.75 86.75
Juglans acuminata 95.41 95.41 Quercus paraglauca 70.76  
Garcinia sp. 100.77 100.77   76.45  
Morphotype 1 103.54 103.54   68.42  
Morphotype 3 87.46 87.46   117.69  
Total average  

101.51

  94.51 85.57
      Laurophyllum sp. 77.14 77.14
      Betula sp. 74.26 74.26
      Ulmus sp. 141.99 141.99
      Zelkova ungeri 91.81  
        114.31 103.06
      Liquidambar miosinica 78.28  
        72.69  
        70.81 73.93
      Castanopsis cf. fissa 73.20 73.20
      Entada phaseoloide 72.22 72.22
      Buxus miosempervirens 117.05 117.05
      Syringa zhejiangensis 112.08 112.08
      Lonicera cf. japonica 91.32 91.32
      Rhus turcomanica 86.22 86.22
      Total average  

91.93

  

TABLE 3. The CLAMP results of the Toupi and Shengxian flora. MAT, mean annual temperature; WMMT, warm month mean temperature; CMMT, cold month mean temperature; GROWSEAS, length of the growing season; GSP, mean growing season precipitation; MMGSP, mean monthly growing season precipitation; X3.WET, precipitation during the three wettest months; X3.DRY, precipitation during the three driest months; RH, relative humidity; SH, specific humidity; ENTHAL, enthalpy.

  MAT WMMT CMMT GROWSEAS GSP MMGSP X3.WET X3.DRY RH SH ENTHAL
Toupi 16.7 24.5 9.0 9.2 131.7 14.4 71.9 16.2 75.7 9.8 32.9
Shengxian 13.6 23.8 4.4 7.8 113.1 14.1 67.1 16.4 70.7 7.5 31.6

 

 

 

TABLE 4. Modern climate parameters and the CLAMP and CA results of the Toupi flora and Shengxian flora. MAT, mean annual temperature; WMMT, warm month mean temperature; CMMT, cold month mean temperature; MAP, mean annual precipitation; GROWSEAS, length of the growing season; GSP, mean growing season precipitation; DT, difference between the coldest and warmest month temperature.

Climate parameter Toupi Shengxian
CA1 CLAMP Modern CA CLAMP Modern
MAT (°C) 15.9 (15.7 – 16.1) 16.7 18.4 15.9 (15.7 – 16.1) 13.6 16.5
WMMT (℃) 25.25 (24.9 – 25.6) 24.5 29.5 24.6 (23.6 – 25.6) 23.8 28.4
CMMT (℃) 5.25 (5.0 – 5.5) 9.0 6.5 5.8 (3.8 – 7.8) 4.4 4.3
MAP (mm) 1151(1096 – 1206)   1518.8 1151 (1096 – 1206)   1454
LGS (month)   9.2     7.8  
GSP (mm)   131.7     113.1  
DT (℃) 20.0 (19.4 – 20.6) 15.5 23 18.0 (15.8 – 21.8) 19.8 24.1

Note: 1, the signal is the middle value, to compare with CLAMP results (see Yao et al., 2011).

 

 

TABLE 5. The taxonomic composition of the Toupi flora and Shengxian flora (macro fossil in genera level); data after Ding, 2011; He, 2019; He and Wang, 2021; Xiao et al., 2022, and this study.

Toupi floraShengxian Flora
Pinus Pinus
Calocedrus Calocedrus
Cinnamomum Cinnamomum
Acer Acer
Castanea Castanea
Castanopsis Castanopsis
Quercus Quercus
Liquidambar Liquidambar
Lithocarpus Lithocarpus
Ilex Ilex
Carpinus Carpinus
Juglans Juglans
Lonicera Lonicera
Magnolia Magnolia
Podocarpus Potamogeton
Palaeocarya Ceratophyllum
Carya Buxus
Yua Betula
Hamamelis Ailanthus
Tripetaleia Smilax
Celastrus Actinodaphne
Cedrela Alseodaphne
Aesculus Cyclobalanopsis
Pisiscia Fagus
Dalbergia Cocculus
Berberis Cornus
Mahonia Crataegus
Morus Ficus
Fothergilla Morus
Alseodaphne Loropetalum
Phoebe Indocalamus
Garcinia Sasa
Diospyros Kalopanax
Spiraea Mallotus
Symplocos Myrica
Frangula Paliurus
  Millettia
  Ormosia
  Maackia
  Dalbergia
  Polygonum
  Syringa
  Zelkova
  Ulmus
  Lagerstroemia
  Trapa
  Abies
  Cedrus
  Keteleeria
  Picea
  Pseudolarix
  Tsuga
  Cunninghamia
  Metasequoia
  Cephalotaxus
  Torreya
  Machilus
  Laurophyllum
  Cercis
  Salix
  Cladrastis
  Etada
  Rhus
  Choerospondias
  Lindera