SEARCH SEARCH

Article Search

TABLE 1. Summary of Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS spectral reflectance values for BYU fossil localities.

Localities
(X1)
Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 Band 7 Band 8 Band 9 Band 10 Band 11
Min 12046 11723 11885 13149 15913 16656 14894 12103 5053 33617 31272
Max 15424 15792 17097 19598 23183 27431 23548 17202 5121 37427 34134
Mean 13284 13280 13970 15795 19045 21682 19464 14571 5087 35632 32796
St. Dev 625 776 1101 1349 1675 2687 2156 1237 16 819 598
# Obsv. 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 88 84 84 84
Range 3378 4069 5212 6449 7270 10775 8654 5099 68 3810 2862

 

 

TABLE 2. Summary of Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS spectral reflectance values for the Cedar Mountain Fm.

CMF
(X2)
Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 Band 7 Band 8 Band 9 Band 10 Band 11
Min 10547 9982 9854 9006 7579 5619 5814 8707 5032 29753 28386
Max 20503 21474 22904 25674 30303 33324 30605 25317 5155 39072 35259
Mean 14201 14332 15125 16692 20006 23083 20529 15867 5095 35717 32925
St. Dev 1799 2110 2431 2808 3380 4196 3793 3186 32 1680 1373
# Obsv 191110 191110 191110 191110 191110 191110 191110 764537 191110 191110 191110
Range 9956 11492 13050 16668 22724 27705 24791 16610 123 9319 6873

 

 

 

TABLE 3. Reclassified values for OLI/TIRS bands used in weighted suitability analysis.

Reclassed
Value
Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 Band 7 Band 10 Band 11
1 10547- 12045 9982-11722 9854 - 11884 9006 - 13148 7579 - 15912 5619 - 16655 5814 - 14893 29753 - 33616 28386 - 31271
5 12045 - 15424 11722-15792 11884 - 17097 13148 - 19598 15912 - 23183 16655 - 27431 14893 - 23548 33616 - 37427 31271 - 34134
1 15424- 20503 15792-21474 17097 - 22904 19598 - 25674 23183 - 30303 27431 - 33324 23548 - 30605 37427 - 39072 34134 - 35259

 

 

 

TABLE 4. Suitability analysis weights for model.

  Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 Band 7 Band 10 Band 11
% Weight 12% 14% 15% 12% 12% 18% 14% 1% 2%

 

 

 

TABLE 5. Summary of field test results.

Site Geological
Description
Paleontological
Description
Member Notes
1 Light brown, medium-coarse grained, planar bedded sandstone with gravel conglomerate stringers; green, white, and rusty red mudstone; and white and orange sandy limestone. No vertebrate fossils found. Yellow Cat  
2 Surface is covered mostly by colluvium with some outcrop of brown, medium grained, planar bedded, sandstone to conglomerate with spheroidal iron concretions; red, fine-grained sandstone; brown mudstone; and whitish limestone. No vertebrate fossils found. Yellow Cat  
3 Surface is covered mostly by colluvium with some boulders of light brown, medium - coarse grained, planar bedded, sandstone with irregular ripples; green, white and red mudstone; and greenish-white very coarse grained sandstone to gravel conglomerate. No vertebrate fossils found. Yellow Cat Slope too steep to survey safely.
4 Surface is covered mostly by colluvium with some boulders of light brown, medium - coarse grained, planar bedded, sandstone with irregular ripples; green, white and red mudstone; and greenish-white very coarse grained sandstone to gravel conglomerate. No vertebrate fossils found. Yellow Cat Slope too steep to survey safely.
5 Surface is covered mostly by colluvium with some outcrop of light brown, medium grained, planar sandstone; and green, light brown, and purple mudstone. No vertebrate fossils found. Yellow Cat Invertebrate trace fossils found.
6 Surface is covered mostly by colluvium with some outcrop of light brown, medium grained, planar sandstone; and green, purple, and white mudstone. No vertebrate fossils found. Ruby Ranch  
7 Light brown, medium grained, planar sandstone with minor light brown sandy topsoil. No vertebrate fossils found. Ruby Ranch  
8 Light brown and whitish orange coarse grained sandstone with pebble conglomerate lenses. 10-20 large bone fragments found. Ruby Ranch Possibly Poison Strip
9 Surface is covered mostly by light grayish brown, muddy colluvium with minor outcrop of light brown, medium grained sandstone and pebble conglomerate. No vertebrate fossils found. Ruby Ranch Slope very flat, little outcrop.
10 Surface is covered mostly by light grayish brown, muddy colluvium with minor outcrop of light brown, medium grained sandstone and pebble conglomerate. No vertebrate fossils found. Ruby Ranch Slope very flat, little outcrop.

 

 

 

TABLE 6. Reclassified values for OLI/TIRS bands for revised model.

Reclassed Value Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 Band 7
1 10547 - 12033 9982 - 11729 9854 - 11769 9006 - 13097 7579 - 15695 5619 - 16308 5814 - 15152
5 12033 - 12658 11729 - 12504 11769 - 12870 13097 - 14446 15695 - 17370 16308 - 18995 15152 - 17308
9 12658 - 13909 12504 - 14056 12871 - 15071 14446 - 17145 17371 - 20720 18995 - 24369 17308 - 21620
5 13909 - 14534 14056 - 14831 15071 - 16172 17154 - 18494 20720 - 22395 24369 - 20720 21620 - 23776
1 14534 - 20503 14831 - 21474 16172 - 22904 18494 - 25674 22395 - 30303 20720 - 22395 23776 - 30605

 

 

 

TABLE 7. Suitability analysis weights for revised model.

  Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 Band 7
% Weight 12% 14% 16% 12% 13% 19% 14%

 

 

 

TABLE 8. Test site change in fossil potential between models.

Potential Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Site 9 Site 10
Original 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Revised 6 8 5 5 9 9 9 9 7 7

 

 

 

TABLE 9. Distribution of slopes for the entire Cedar Mountain Formation compared to BYU fossil localities.

Slope BYU
Localities
%
Total
Cedar
Mountain Fm.
%
Total
0°-5° 8 8.60% 2,641,591 38.47%
5°-10° 7 7.53% 2,039,087 29.70%
10°-15° 5 5.38% 940,622 13.70%
15°-20° 4 4.30% 508,347 7.40%
20°-25° 13 13.98% 339,526 4.95%
25°-30° 22 3.66% 201,090 2.93%
30°-35° 15 16.13% 112,555 1.64%
35°-40° 12 12.90% 51,371 0.75%
40°-45° 5 5.38% 18,215 0.27%
45°-50° 1 1.08% 7,913 0.12%
50°-55° 0 0.00% 3,391 0.05%
55°-60° 0 0.00% 1,500 0.02%
60°-65° 1 1.08% 468 0.01%
65°-70° 0 0.00% 126 0.00%
70°-75° 0 0.00% 10 0.00%
Total 93 100.00% 6,865,812 100.00%
Minimum 1.7179   0  
Maximum 56.2603   73.2043  
Mean 26.7111   9.2717  
Standard Dev. 10.7417   7.9199  

 

 

TABLE 10. Coordinate systems of datasets used in analysis.

Dataset Coordinate System
Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS WGS 84 UTM Zone 12N
Doelling (2002) NAD 1927 UTM Zone 12N
1:24,000 scale maps NAD 1927 UTM Zone 12N
DEM NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12N
BYU localities WGS 84 UTM Zone 12N
Published Localities NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12N

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 11. Comparison of Fossil Potential to BYU and Published Localities.

Fossil Potential Value 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Outside Total
BYU Localities         5 4 4 5 12 68 98
Published Localities                 1 9 10