HOW TO GET A REPUTATION IN
PALEONTOLOGY II:
A BETTER TWELVE-STEP PROGRAM
In my last editorial
(Lipps 2002),
I suggested a 12-step (actually 13) program on how to get a reputation in
paleontology. Those recommendations brought much jocosity, many comments and
more than a few stories of how others themselves had been on the receiving end
of one or more of those 13 steps. They sent me personal emails telling me their
tales, but no one sent them to the Palaeontologica Electronica discussion
section. Of course not, for the paleontologists who had made their reputations
in that way are still alive, still active and still in positions of influence.
So I won’t divulge what my emailers wrote, but many were quite funny even when
bitterly written. Some of those stories went back decades! I think I can safely
say that the writers will never forget the transgressions against them, and the
reputations (as in my previous editorial) of the perpetrators remain secure.
So now I would like to suggest a better 12-step
program to get a reputation in paleontology.
For many of us, these observations are too late;
we already have a reputation for better or for worse. Maybe you won’t want to
read on, but for teachers and for those who are newly entering the field—students,
postdocs, and amateurs, I hope you will find these observations and suggestions,
although not comprehensive, to be useful, enlightening or at least a reminder.
- Write great papers. Be creative—think of
really new ideas and test them properly. Be thorough. Write well. Do not
obfuscate! Clarity over big words is always best. Make your point right away
so no one has to work to see what you are saying. Be current. Cite the
latest stuff, as well as the original material, no matter how old it is. Use
Georef, Biosis and other bibliographic search engines to make sure you have
the relevant literature on the topic. Remember, if you miss someone’s
paper that really should be cited, they will remember you a long time.
Better to find those—all authors love to see themselves cited, especially
when their papers are important to yours. Your reputation will grow, if you
say nice things about them.
- Publish in great places that matter. Will
prominent paleontologists read your papers? It will do you little good to
publish in the Journal of Material Sciences. Choose Palaeontologica
Electronica, Paleobiology, Palaeontology, Journal of Paleontology, and
similar well-known journals.
- Great illustrations count. Sharp images, and
clear, bold diagrams. "A picture is worth a thousand words and a good
or bad reputation" (I added the last phrase). If you publish in color,
as you can in Palaeontologica Electronica, be kind to the "color
handicapped" readers (see end note).
- Give great and enjoyable talks. Have fun, and
your stage fright may diminish. Most importantly, have really nice slides,
and now with computers and digital cameras you can really impress everyone.
Slides are to help the audience. If they also help you give the talk, so
much the better. Many of the people who are critical to your reputation can’t
see very well anymore or, like many paleontologists, are color blind. Some
can’t hear well, either. Keep these folks in mind—they mean a lot to
your reputation. Use BIG and few words on your slides. Use color carefully
(endnote again). Over 50% of your audience will really think you are good,
if they can just see your slides. Use the microphone. Speak well. Don’t
read. Practice!
- Let your buddies in paleontology read or hear
about your work before you send it in. They’ll think you’re neat and
they might help you too.
- Be sure to thank everyone who helped. That one
person you thank, whether it is your major professor or the collector who
merely tossed a fossil into your collecting bag, will remember when you do,
that you are a swell person and a good paleontologist. Thanks are of little
effort and the payoff is high!
- Build trust. Don’t do any of those things I
mentioned in my last editorial! You really don’t want that kind of
reputation, and I gather that there are quite enough of those folks around
anyway. And not just among paleontologists.
- Be nice. Be kind. Speak well of other
paleontologists. You never know how your comments may be relayed to the next
paleontologist.
- Be humble, but interesting. Everyone is an
expert on something in our field, and we don’t like self-important
paleontologists telling us how good they are. Just have fun discussing your
work and opinions.
- Smile a lot. Everybody loves a smile. Everybody
feels good with a genuine smile. It won’t hurt either.
- Keep your sense of humor polished. People like
that. Because we have so much in paleontology to be joyful about, we don’t
need sourpusses.
- And, above all, have fun. When you have fun,
everyone around you will too. The excitement of the dig, the thrill of
discovery, the pleasure in excellent research, and the pride in doing a good
paper or talk all make for enormous fun and happiness.
There you have it. Nothing special here and you
should have heard it many times before in one context or another. But with
paleontologists out there who practice "How to get a reputation in
paleontology Part I", perhaps you will forgive me for reminding you again
of these steps.
A special note about color: Many of us are color
blind, or more properly "color deficient" (What Is Colorblindness and the Different
Types? [Waggoner 2003]). About 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women have this condition, and 99%
of those are red and/or green "weak". This condition makes certain
color images a trial for these people, and even our best websites and journals
miss this (see Breaking
the Color Barrier [Holden 2002]). In paleontology, color deficiencies seem to run higher
than that, perhaps because as students these people migrate to topics where
color is not critical. Imagine a color-deficient petrologist or cytologist! Two
factors are important—the color of the object and the color of the background.
Hues of red and green on blue or yellow may mean that 10% of the people you want
to impress, can’t be but instead will be frustrated—and there goes a chunk
of your reputation right down the tubes. Make your colors bold and saturated (Color
Vision, Color Deficiency [Wilson
1996]), and never use colors (especially reds and greens)
as keys to your slides; patterns are better. If you must use colors, as in some
illustrations, try converting the reds to magenta (see Color
Blind-Friendly Presentation (Okabe
and Ito 2002) for this and other suggestions). Thus, overall a
significant part of your audience will like you a whole lot when you show slides
that have colors that they can see (you can test this now on-line at sites like Vischeck
that will show you what an image looks like to a color deficient person). A
little work will go a long way in making your reputation secure in everyone’s
mind!