|
APPENDIXTable 2. Results for the best estimate model of MOR 693.
Table 5. Results for the best estimate model of MOR 693 with an abdominal air sac. Table 6. Results for the best estimate model of MOR 693 with enlarged (+15%) legs. Table 7. Results for the best estimate model of MOR 693 with reduced (- 7.5%) legs. Table 8. Results for the - 7.5% best estimate model of MOR 693. Table 9. Results for the - 7.5% best estimate model of MOR 693 with enlarged lungs.
Table 11. Results for the + 7.5% best estimate model of MOR 693.
Table 13. Results for the + 15% best estimate model of MOR 693. Table 14. Results for the + 15% best estimate model with reduced respiratory structures.
Table 16. Results for best estimate model of MOR 693 with + 15% tail and - 7.5% neck and thorax. Table 17. Results for best estimate model of MOR 693 with - 7.5% tail and + 15% neck and thorax. Table 18. Results for best estimate model of MOR 693 with + 11.25% tail and - 7.5% neck and thorax. Table 19. Results for best estimate model of MOR 693 with - 7.5% tail and + 11.25% neck and thorax. Table 20. Results for the best estimate model of MOR 693 with an enlarged rib cage. Table 21. Results for the best estimate model of MOR 693 with a contracted rib cage.
Table 23. Summary of results for mixed HAT segments sensitivity analysis.
*Best estimate thoracic and neck volumes with enlarged
thoracic and pharyngeal air sacs. Table 24. Predicted hind limb mass proportions expressed as percentage of total body mass for models of each specimen. Table 25. Percentage volume contribution of respiratory structure in selected models.
Table 26. Measurements between centra, taken on lateral
surface at middle of centra for a selection of vertebrae in the mounted cast of
MOR 693 at the University of Wyoming Geological Museum. Not every vertebral
spacing was measured, but sequential measurements for most vertebrae in the
dorsal and caudal series are provided, starting anteriorly from the first dorsal
and caudal vertebrae and moving posteriorly. |