SEARCH SEARCH

Article Search

For all supplemental material see 492_supplemental.zip.

SUPPLEMENTARY MOVIE

Visualization of the flow within the 3D printed model (Re = 0.376, see Table 1). Flow in the folds consists of horizontal bands of distinct red and blue color, indicating no adoral component to flow and no mixing within the folds, consistent with Hypothesis 2 (see text, Figure 2.2). The animation is sped up 16x. Figure 4 shows a single frame from the flow pattern observed, showing the steady-state flow pattern after nine minutes of flow. Click on image to activate animation.

figure 4 

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S1.

Full calculations for in vivo flow conditions.

What is the Re for blastoid Pentremites rusticus in vivo?
Assumed values shown in blue along with source
     
Environmental data    
nu, kinematic viscosity, m^2/s 1.00E-006 Use 1e-6 for 25C, 1.4 for 12C, 1.8 for 0C
     
Case 1: Cilia in pore canals    
     
At the pore    
Pore diameter, m 2.54E-005 Measured from Schmidtling and Marshall 2010
Pore area, m^2 0.0000000005  
Clia velocity, m/s 6.00E-004 Paul 1978
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0  
Re,D pore 0.01524 Implies laminar flow
     
In the folds    
Spacing between folds, m 4.26E-005  
Spacing between pores, m 2.65E-004 Schmidtling and Marshall 2010
Number of folds per pore 3 From Schmidtling and Marshall, figure 6
Fold area, m^2 0.0000000339 66.809793371
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0  
Velocity in fold, m/s 0.0000089807 m/s
Dh fold, 4*FA/WP 0.0000733744 for finite channels
Dh fold, 2*spacing 0.0000851648 for infinite array of closely spaced plates
Re,Dh fold 0.0006589551  
Re,Dh2 fold 0.0007648415 Implies laminar flow
     
     
Case 2: Cilia in folds    
     
At the pore    
Pore diameter, m 2.54E-005 Measured from Schmidtling and Marshall 2010
Pore area, m^2 0.0000000005  
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0  
Pore velocity, m/s 0.040085876  
Re,D pore 1.018181251 Implies laminar flow
     
In the folds    
Spacing between folds, m 4.26E-005 NOT measured in Schmidtling and Marshall; Tony measured in x-ray image
Spacing between pores, m 2.65E-004 7x pore diameter
Number of folds per pore 3 From Schmidtling and Marshall, figure 6
Fold area, m^2 0.0000000339  
Cilia velocity, m/s 6.00E-004 Paul 1978
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0  
Dh fold, 4*FA/WP 0.0000733744 For finite channels
Dh fold, 2*spacing 0.0000851648 For infinite array of closely spaced plates
Re,Dh fold 0.0440246517  
Re,Dh2 fold 0.0510989011 Implies laminar flow
     
Case 2 is the controlling case (higher Re, highest mixing expected there).    

 

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S2.

Full calculations for model flow conditions as tested.

What is the Re for the model as tested?
Assumed values shown in blue along with source
       
Environmental data      
nu, kinematic viscosity, m^2/s 1.00E-006 Use 1e-6 for freshwater at 25 C  
    Use 27e-6 for mineral oil  
       
At the faucet      
Time, s 4034 Tony Huynh measured  
Level change, m 0.0025 Tony Huynh measured  
Area, m^2 0.1114302763 Tony Huynh measured, for McMurdo portable tank with black screens  
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0000000691    
       
At the pore      
pPore diameter, m 1.85E-003 TH design, CM, DE measured  
Pore area, m^2 2.69E-006    
Number of pores connected 8    
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0000000086 1/8 of flow from tap  
Velocity at pore, m/s 0.0032113231    
Re,D pore 5.9409476461 transition, less than 10  
       
In the folds      
Spacing between folds, m 3.10E-003 TH design, CM DE measured  
Spacing between pores, m 0.0153 TH designed, DE meas STL  
Number of folds per pore 3 Tony Huynh designed into model, Fig 3  
Fold area, m^2 1.42E-004 52.9347713135  
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0000000086    
Velocity in fold, m/s 0.0000606657 m/s  
Dh fold, 4*FA/WP 0.0051554348 for finite channels  
Dh fold, 2*spacing 0.0062 for infinite array of closely spaced plates  
Re,Dh fold 0.3127578744    
Re,Dh2 fold 0.376127117 laminar  
  7.4 x in vivo Re  

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE S3.

Full calculations for model operated to match lowest Re in vivo case.

What speed would we have to run at to match in vivo
Assumed values shown in blue along with source
     
Environmental data    
nu, kinematic viscosity, m^2/s 1.00E-006 Use 1e-6 for freshwater at 25 C
    Use 30e-6 for mineral oil
     
At the pore    
Pore diameter, m 1.85E-003 Tony Huynh designed
Pore area, m^2 0.000002688  
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0000000016  
Velocity at pore, m/s 5.85E-004  
Re,D pore 1.081961112 Transition, less than 10
     
In the folds    
Spacing between folds, m 3.10E-003 Tony Huynh designed
Spacing between pores, m 0.0153 Tony Huynh designed
Number of folds per pore 3 Tony Huynh designed into model, Fig 3
Fold area, m^2 0.00014229  
Volumetric flow rate m^3/s 0.0000000016  
Velocity in fold, m/s 0.0000110484 m/s
Dh fold, 4*FA/WP 0.0051554348 For finite channels
Dh fold, 2*spacing 0.0062 For infinite array of closely spaced plates
Re,Dh fold 0.0569592391  
Re,Dh2 fold 0.0685 Implies laminar flow
     
Re in vivo, case 1 0.0007648415  
Re in vivo, case 2 0.0510989011  

 

SUPPLEMENTARY FILE.

Stereolithography (STL) file of model of the distal end of the hydrospire in Pentremites rusticus (see palaeo-electronica.org/content/2015/1073-blastoid-hydrospire-fluid-flow) (see 492_supplemental.zip).