SEARCH SEARCH

Article Search

FIGURE 1. Specimen DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov. (A) under daylight condition; (B) under UV (365 nm), by courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger. Scale bars equal 5 cm.

 figure1

 

 

FIGURE 2. Interpretative drawing and key for DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov. Soft tissue preservation and areas of uncertain bone tracing are left out.

 

 figure2

 

FIGURE 3. Close-up of skull and neck, DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov. (A) under UV (365 nm), courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger; (B) line drawing interpretation. Note that minor proportional deviations in the key drawing result from zoom and lens effects due to a different master photography.

figure3 

 

 

FIGURE 4. Skull reconstruction of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov., from subadult holotype. The mandible is also shown in dorsal aspect, leaving out the unknown replacement teeth of the left side. For osteological key see Figure 2.

 figure4

 

 

FIGURE 5. Close-up of trunk and hip region, DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov., under UV (365 nm), courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger.

 figure5

 

 

FIGURE 6. Close-up of mid-caudal series, DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov., under UV (365 nm), courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger.

 figure6

 

 

FIGURE 7. Close-up of wrists, DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov., under UV (365 nm), courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger.

figure7 

 

 

FIGURE 8. Close-up of hindlimbs and feet, DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov., under UV (365 nm), courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger.

 figure8

 

 

FIGURE 9. Close-up of pathological wing phalanx, DMA-JP-2011/006, holotype of Propterodacylus frankerlae, gen. nov., sp. nov., under UV (365 nm), courtesy of Helmut Tischlinger.

 figure9

 

 

FIGURE 10. Phylogenetic analyses that included Propterodactylus, formerly known as the “Painten (pro-)pterodactyloid”, restricted to chosen taxa. Note that there is little consensus about most relationships beyond the monophyly of Pterodactyloidea (green, blue, violet), while the position of Propterodactylus is challenged only by the fragmentarily known and barely diagnosed Kryptodrakon (introduced as the oldest pterodactyloid under deviant constraints, see Andres et al., 2014).

figure10