Issue
Table of Contents

Response Lucas et al. (2009)
FASSETT

Plain-Language &
Multilingual  Abstracts

Abstract

Introduction 

Lithostratigraphy

Palynology 

Magnetostratigraphy 

Geochemistry

Vertebrate Biochronology

Animas Formation Dinosaurs

Figure 1 of Lucas et al. (2009)

Conclusion

References

 

Print article

 
 
 

CONCLUSION

The rhetorical statements of Lucas et al. (2009) do not refute the findings of Fassett (2009) that the Ojo Alamo Sandstone and the Animas Formation and their contained dinosaurs and other vertebrate fossils are Paleocene in age. Lucas et al. (2009) offer no data with which to refute the detailed data set presented in Fassett (2009), thus that data remains unchallenged, in any meaningful way, by the Lucas et al. critique.

 

 

 

 

 
 

Next Section

Response Lucas et al. (2009)
Plain-Language & Multilingual  Abstracts | Abstract | Introduction  | Lithostratigraphy | Palynology 
Magnetostratigraphy | Geochemistry | Vertebrate Biochronology | Animas Formation Dinosaurs 
Figure 1 of Lucas et al. (2009) | Conclusion |  References
Print article